4 Key Ballot Questions Face Philly Voters

Filed under: Politics,Subject Categories |

Four questions will appear on Philadelphia’s November 6, 2012 ballot. Voters will get a chance to vote “Yes” or “No”.

The first is an important one for every property owner. It reads, “Shall The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter be amended to allow for the establishment of an independent rate-making body for fixing and regulating water and sewer rates and charges and to prescribe open and transparent processes and procedures for fixing and regulating said rates and charges?” Passing this is crucial, since this amendment to the Home Rule Charter would permit City Council to create an independent rate-making body to set water and sewer rates, and to regulate how those rates are imposed. Currently, the Philadelphia Water Dept. has the final responsibility for setting and regulating rates and charges for water and sewer services.

Council would also be able to establish procedures to be followed by the new body in setting rates and charges. These procedures would have to be open and transparent. As of now, businesses are staggering from the enormous drainage rates which the Water Dept. has levied on them.

The second is “Shall The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter be amended to authorize the creation by ordinance of requirements for additional information to be submitted with the annual operating budget, annual capital budget, and capital program, including, but not limited to, information about the cost of performing specific functions, the effectiveness of such functions, and the costs versus benefits of proposed expenditures, and to require the Finance Director to provide such provide such information?”

The Home Rule Charter currently requires the Mayor to submit to Council, each year, a proposed annual operating budget, a proposed annual capital budget and a proposed capital program. This amendment to the Home Rule Charter would authorize City Council to require the Director of Finance to submit to Council information relating to the Mayor’s budget proposals. Such information could include information about the costs and benefits of specific functions and expenditures.

The third is “Shall The Philadelphia Home Rule Charter – which allows for a preference in the civil-service regulations for the children of Philadelphia firefighters or police officers who were killed or who died in the line of duty – be amended to further allow for a preference for the grandchildren of such firefighters or police officers?” This amendment to the Home Rule Charter would authorize City Council to provide a preference on civil-service entrance examinations to the grandchildren of firefighters and police officers killed in the line of duty.

The fourth is “Should the City of Philadelphia borrow one hundred twenty three million six hundred seventy thousand dollars ($123,670,000) to be spent for and toward capital purposes as follows: Transit; Streets and Sanitation; Municipal Buildings; Parks, Recreation and Museums; and Economic and Community Development?” This ballot question, if approved by the voters, would authorize the City to borrow $123,670,000 for capital purposes, thereby increasing the City’s indebtedness by $123,670,000. Capital purposes means, generally, to make expenditures that will result in something of value with a useful life to the City of more than five years, for example, acquisitions of real estate, or construction of or improvements to buildings, property or streets. The money to be borrowed would be used by the City for five identified purposes, namely, Transit; Streets & Sanitation; Municipal Buildings; Parks, Recreation & Museums; and Economic & Community Development.

JOIN OUR NEWSPAPER
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
Share
www.pdf24.org    Send article as PDF   

One Response to 4 Key Ballot Questions Face Philly Voters

  1. 1) Yes, water prices need to be checked by City Council. Do you know that the city’s water prices have gone up more that 150 percent in 12 years? (USA Today)
    2) Yes, the mayor’s office should be checked on how it spends money.
    3) No. Why would losing a family member make you more apt to serve? And what significant good would preference make?
    4) Where are they borrowing the money from? I would love more detail into how this money would be spent. Therefore, I’ll have to vote no.

    Sydney Epps
    November 5, 2012 at 9:25 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *