BY MICHAEL P. BOYLE, ESQ./ This week I will address recent testimony given by Kathy A. Ruffing, a Senior Fellow at the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities, before the Subcommittee on Social Security in the US House of Representatives.
According to Ruffing, “the bulk of the rise in federal disability rolls stems from demographic factors: the aging of the US population, the growth in women’s employment, and Social Security’s rising retirement age.â€
Ruffing told the Subcommittee “People are roughly twice as likely to be disabled at age 50 as at age 40, and twice as likely to be disabled at age 60 as at age 50.†Ruffing noted the increase in full retirement age from 65 to 66 has added to claimants receiving disability benefits (DI).
Ruffing observed that, in December 2012, more than 450,000 people between 65 and 66 — over 5% of all DI beneficiaries — collected disabled-worker benefits. Under the applicable rules 10 years ago, they would have received retirement benefits instead. Ruffing reported that, until the mid-1990s, “insured women of any age– … who had worked enough to qualify for DI in the event of disability — were only about three-fourths as likely as insured men to receive DI benefits.†She added, “Now they are equally likely to do so.â€
Ruffing also told the Subcommittee, “The accelerating pace of globalization and technological change has been particularly unforgiving to older, less-educated workers and those with cognitive impairments.†She noted that, in the past, these workers “might have been able to find jobs [but] the combination of poor health and poor labor market prospects has probably tipped many onto the disability rolls.â€
She also observed, “With employer-sponsored health insurance eroding and the individual-policy market becoming costlier or outright unavailable, Medicare eligibility may loom larger and larger in some workers’ decisions to apply for DI.â€
I will discuss more of Ruffing’s testimony in next week’s column.
I’m not sure about the amount of people on the verge of retirement, but with people who are over 50 years of age and have had long working years and lots of them, contracted illness at their ages would be painful; and to be on medications for years is an even worse situation. They would all deserve their DI since medication only helps for a few years. Over many years, medication eventually somehow will create more problems for their illness and probably will make termination of their lives sooner … IMHO
Joseph Huynh
May 30, 2013 at 11:33 am
I will be 56 on my next birthday. The factory where I was working closed for good, throwing me and around 650 others out of work. The region I live in (West TN) has some of the highest unemployment rates in the nation. Most counties have double-digit unemployment and for a man with my health problems, finding a job of any kind is akin to impossible. I have severe arthritis throughout my body, but especially my lower back and both knees. I applied for SSDI in Oct of 2012.
I was denied disability after waiting over 6 months (and having two x-rays and exam). The system is broken & set up to discourage people from applying. It is a disgrace.
Dennis
May 30, 2013 at 11:52 am