OPINION: Reefer Madness Revisited

Filed under: Featured News,Subject Categories |

BY JOHN DAME
More than 40 years ago, I ran a rock radio station, Starview 92.7-FM in Central Pennsylvania. We were the first radio station to offer special midnight movies. These movies included a 1930s anti-drug movie called Reefer Madness, which warned of a descent into madness for those lured into trying marijuana. This propaganda film was quite campy and funny, especially in the culture of the late 1970s, where pot smoking was pervasive.

Today, we have a different version of reefer madness facing us – and it’s one that should be taken in a bit more serious tone. It stems from the unintended consequences of the legalization of medical marijuana in Pennsylvania, which occurred in August 2016. Marijuana and its active ingredients (in various forms) can help patients deal with symptoms of migraines, cancer, Parkinson’s, seizures and glaucoma, among a host of other diseases and illnesses. The positive results of taking medical marijuana are incredibly real for patients who struggle every day to live and work.

While the Pennsylvania legislature voted to legalize medical marijuana, it did very little to provide guidance for businesses and schools that now struggle with how to deal with employees and students who have been prescribed medical marijuana.

Most organizations have clear policies regarding the usage of any illegal substances, including marijuana. Often times, it’s a zero-tolerance policy – if you test positive, you’re out. Marijuana is illegal federally, even though more than 30 states have relaxed their laws to make medical (and in some cases recreational) marijuana legal. Yet, no CEO wants an employee operating heavy equipment or driving company vehicles with marijuana in their system.

When there is a workplace accident of any kind, the people involved are immediately subject to a drug test. If drugs or alcohol are found, they are terminated. Companies do not want to put themselves at risk of legal action, especially if someone is seriously injured.

The unintended consequence is that valuable employees being helped by medical marijuana will be treated differently at work due to the risk the company is being exposed to as the result of these now-legal prescriptions. You can see how this dilemma could be maddening for employers, with no guidance from those who enacted the law.

BUSINESS consultant John Dame argues there is a disconnect between the right of medical-marijuana patiernts to employment – and the obligation of employers to test for drugs.

Same goes for our school districts. I recently spoke with a superintendent who explained that if a child needs a prescribed drug while at school, the school nurse will administer it – except for medical marijuana, since it is still a federal crime, regardless of the state law. A child would need to leave the school grounds to take the prescribed marijuana and could not return if there remains any marijuana in his or her system. The problem is that the active ingredient in marijuana can stay in a person’s body for several days or even weeks. Again, what a maddening situation!

Here’s the issue: Our State legislature rightfully legalized medical marijuana, and it is a real blessing for those who battle the pain of illness or disease. Unfortunately, our lawmakers forgot that businesses and schools are bound by the federal law regulating drug use at the worksite and at school. These entities are being forced to establish policies for themselves without guidance from the legislature. If the legislature does not act to help companies and school districts understand how to deal with employees and students taking medical marijuana, then these organizations will be forced to take action that reflects current federal laws and potentially hurt good people.

Let’s stop this madness! From a business perspective, my advice for companies would be to only drug-test individuals who show up visibly high or unable to perform their work. Of course, safety on the worksite is still paramount. Check with your attorney and insurance company about permitting individuals who have been prescribed medical marijuana a place in your company to be medicated safely. Don’t lose great employees struggling with medical issues.

In our schools, districts need to work out a policy and let parents know what it is well in advance. Pennsylvania businesses and school districts shouldn’t have to go it alone. The General Assembly needs to put an end to this reefer madness by offering solutions to the unintended consequences they created.

A CEO coach to countless business leaders, John Dame (“JD”) is an executive team consultant and leadership strategist based in Pennsylvania.

JOIN OUR NEWSPAPER
Join over 3.000 visitors who are receiving our newsletter and learn how to optimize your blog for search engines, find free traffic, and monetize your website.
We hate spam. Your email address will not be sold or shared with anyone else.
Share
www.pdf24.org    Send article as PDF   

One Response to OPINION: Reefer Madness Revisited

  1. 110,000+ patients short in your graphic. As far as employers are concerned. And DUI testing for that matter. There is no problem if you are just testing for the active metabolites that signal that someone has recently consumed. The inactive metabolites should not be tested for for two or more reasons. It has no relationship with impairment and it violates the privacy rights of MMJ patients. As another unintended consequence if you were pulled over by the police and they find out you are a patient they will instantly DUI you on the spot. If they find the inactive metabolite they will charge you and convict you for DUI even though there is no chance of you being impaired. This goes beyond unfair. This is criminal. Criminal actions by law-enforcement. No one should be charged with a crime they didn’t commit just because of the type of medicine they take. My own case the expert witness from the lab company repeatedly testified that there could be no impairment through my results but the prosecutor still pressed forward and the judge convicted me. As someone with PTSD I can tell you that being arrested for a crime I didn’t Commit and charged and convicted for that crime has not helped with my health problems. This insanity needs to end.

    Pat murphy
    July 26, 2019 at 3:06 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *